Limbo
I saw an AP news article yesterday that summarized the recent revision in Roman Catholic teaching about limbo. The report states that “there was reason to hope that babies who die without baptism can go to heaven.” Apparently, the Pope urged further study about limbo due to the growing number of children that are dying prior to baptism.
There are so many things to say about this. I think the first thing I wonder about is how, exactly, does anyone study limbo. Do they go there and do archeological research? Do they interview unbaptized babies that had near death experiences? How does one study limbo?
Secondly, it would seem that they are not quite ready to throw out the limbo idea entirely. They say that there is “reason to have hope” for these children, which seems just shy of giving us the go ahead to believe that they are in heaven. I guess since we can’t know for sure, the best we can do is hope. Because, you know, God might not be able to “save” unbaptized babies - God can only do so much.
All sarcasm and skepticism aside, I have to admit that I didn’t actually read the report, I only read the news article. I suppose this could be a move in a new direction for Catholic theology. This could have larger implications in relation to theologies around Original Sin and how that impacts one’s salvation (or lack thereof, as the case may be). If unbaptized babies are no longer at risk, does that mean that we are no longer at risk either? What does that mean for the need for baptism or why baptism is important? It will be interesting to watch and see what happens next.
It is good to think carefully and revise our theologies occasionally. My systematic theology professor last week really challenged the ease at which I just accept the Chalcedon doctrine of the dual natures of Jesus. He pushed me to think about why I just accept that as truth, even though the concepts and terminology they use are really foreign to 21st century science and reasoning. It never ceases to amaze me how much Catholic doctrine I absorbed as a kid and just have kept in my lexicon. My professor was right, I need to think about this question in a new way. He’s offered to bring some articles with updated ideas about the nature of Jesus for me to read. I’m looking forward to reading about it and might just write my final paper for the class about it. I might end up not changing my theology at all, but at least I’ll have thought about it and considered some different ideas.